Ethical Vampires and Readers are Misunderstood

October 27, 2009

Vampire DiariesI don’t have to tell you what’s clogging up the young adult fiction section at Barnes & Nobles these days. Everywhere you turn, there is another display with overloaded stacks of books of teen vampire and werewolf stories. Apparently, they’re selling, and all the publishing houses want in on the profits. Culturally centered media outlets are saying all sorts of things about how this reflects on American youth. It’s assumed the vampire craze is a trend that is repeated every time monsters stories — especially vampire related ones — rise to the forefront of pop culture (as they have in the past with the introduction of classic monster stories like Dracula).

Fascinated by the living dead we are, so it seems. Who doesn’t like living forever — even though vampires are not really “living?” Superpowers thrown in to boot for these immortal beings… their stories are soul-searching, introspective, and sucking the life out of, well, the readers’ interest in the living. Escapism takes on an infinite number of forms. This escapism into the dark of night surrounded by bloodsuckers is just one form that’s grabbing pop culture. So why are we captivated by them now? For that matter, are we captivated by them, or something else in their stories more specific we’re not finding in other fiction and real life?

Seems most news sources have an opinion about this. Most writers credit Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight saga for precipitating the cultural enthusiasm for the living dead. I don’t know if this is true, but I’ve gathered from many sources that Twilight is to thank for the vampire craze. Seeing as how Twilight came out and became popular just before most of the rest of the contemporary vampire stories hit the new arrivals, I’d say there is some merit to this position.

If this is the case — Twilight (read my review here ») started the vampire craze — something is strangely overlooked from those that are quick to point out the success of vampire moral/ethical depravity with today’s youth. The story of vampires in the Twilight series supports little traditional vampire evils. Unlike Count Dracula, Edward Cullen and his family (the primary vampires of Twilight) have essentially a Christian ethic. I know that’s terribly ironic, but this is the case in this series of fiction. In Twilight, murder is wrong, violence is condemned, abstinence is virtuous, true love and loyalty are ideal in every romantic relationship. Do these values sound like norms in vampire tales? They’re not, but they are steadfast in the Twilight series.

Edward CullenSo, when pop enthusiasts are quick to exalt vampire lifestyles as culturally acceptable based on book sales of Twilight and the rare few that are like Twilight, they are wrong. A great deal of today’s youth do not admire bloodsuckers for their traditional qualities, but admire the vampire minority that support a highly conservative moral ethic (like those in Twilight). So in reality, the case is quite the reverse of popular opinion. Youth aren’t interested in impulsive blood-sucking — rather, they are interested in withstanding strong temptation, overcoming moral adversity, and a true love never dies view of life.

What does this mean for the books out there that have already been printed to draw the crowds for traditional vampire stories? What about The Vampire Diaries, Vampire Academy, Vampire Kisses, House of Night, and the others? Will these sell? Will masses of teens read them? Will they hit the top 40 reads this year? Yes. There will be many that will read anything. There will be some that rave about these and other vampire stories like them. Do they represent the majority of vampire story readers? Maybe. Do they represent all that enjoy Twilight? No; not by far. Are those that read vampire stories a reflection of this entire generation of teens and young adults? Definitely not.

I don’t believe that monster stories are the best medium of fiction for learning deep truths about the real world, but they can be enlightening nonetheless. The Twilight series has much more to it than critics will tell. Seeing as how it usually takes a fan to pillage all the possible nuances of a story, and how they relate to the reader’s own life, those voicing their criticism and admiration of this generation of youth don’t have all the facts to elaborate on what is compelling the youth to indulge in vampire lore.

2 Responses
  1. October 28, 2009

    Joe,

    Good article. I like your observations and your insight. I have not read the “Twilight” series but I have noticed the rage against such books from popular Christian pastors. I always wonder if they actually have read the series before they condemn it. I think there is a tendency to “react” to the latest “secular” craze to gin up the base in the Church, much like you see in political reactions/movements. I think this is fear based on the part of Christians. They give secular influence so much power that they have to fearfully preach against any contact with it. Rather, they could take the underlying signals that the popular secular craze is projecting and use that information to build better relationships with the lost world. From what you said about the “Twilight” series this is a perfect example. They are popular because of the underlying themes of true love, honor, and resistance to moral depravity. We have the same message in the story of the Bible. If we know that is what the lost world is looking for, we should not condemn what they are reading but use that to explain that we have the archetype story in Christ and all other good stories are just types of HIM. That is why they strike such a cord among Christians and non-Christians alike. I hope you can see where I am going with that thought.

    Also, I find it interesting that some preach against this series because of the “perversion” that is involved. i.e. Vampires, etc. At the same time they have nothing bad to say about the Bible when we have plenty of shady characters in the BIBLE. We even have a witch calling up Samuel from the afterlife. We don’t preach against the Bible for such things because we understand the whole is larger than the sum of the parts. (The Bible as a story instead of individual versus to back up our own application.) Actually, I take that back, very few Christians, especially in the conservative/fundamentalist movement understand or agree with this approach. But I digress.

    One more thought that I find comical. The only hope of Christians, according to some, is the belief of a casket resurrection at the end of time. If you picture that, that could be taken right out of a night of the living dead movie. How are we to preach the good news of the Gospel to the world when we beat them over the head with how bad their “vampire” books are and then turn around and preach that the only hope we have is that we will be physically resurrected… we will become living dead!!!!! Just brings a smile to my face when I think of that conversation between an informed unbeliever and an non-thinking believer.

    Great article, I really enjoyed it!
    Blessings to you and your family,

    In Christ,
    Micah Martin

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. The Christian Character of Sherlock Holmes « Joseph Darnell's Blog

Comments are closed for this entry.